Jeremy Gschwendtner vs Sebastian Gima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do the players compare in second serve performance? Gima has a 41.66% success rate, while Gschwendtner stands at 47.18%, giving Gschwendtner a slight edge.
• In the return game, Gima wins 50.1% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Gschwendtner's 46.06%, suggesting Gima could have the upper hand in this aspect.
• When it comes to saving breakpoints, Gschwendtner leads with a 51.66% save rate against Gima's 48.74%, indicating Gschwendtner's resilience under pressure.
• Overall match performance over the past year shows Gima winning 52.31% of their matches, whereas Gschwendtner has a higher win rate of 62.5%, hinting at a stronger overall form for Gschwendtner.
• Gima excels on hard courts with a 60% win rate, while Gschwendtner performs best on clay with a 58% win rate. Neither player favors indoor hard courts as much.
• Comparing the level of play, both have primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, but Gschwendtner's 63.64% success rate outshines Gima's 56.36%.
• What about opponent quality? Gima faced opponents averaging a rank of 442.94, whereas Gschwendtner's opponents had an average rank of 177.84, suggesting Gschwendtner faced tougher competition.
• Deciding sets reveal that Gima has a 41% success rate, while Gschwendtner boasts a 54%, which may be crucial if the match is tightly contested.
• Who converts breakpoints better? Recently, Gima has a 35.1% conversion rate compared to Gschwendtner's 30.3%, potentially giving Gima an opportunistic advantage.

Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming tennis match showcases two competitors with contrasting strengths. Gschwendtner displays a superior overall win rate over the past year, alongside stronger second serve performance and the ability to save breakpoints effectively. These qualities hint at a player who consistently delivers under pressure and against tougher opponents.

Conversely, Gima excels in returning second serves, converting breakpoints and performing well on hard courts, providing strategic edges in specific match situations. This could prove advantageous, especially if the match takes place on their preferred surface.

Considering the statistical advantages observed over the last months and the level of competition each player has faced, Gschwendtner appears to be the likely winner. Their adeptness in managing high-pressure scenarios, coupled with historically stronger match performances, positions them favorably for this encounter.